APPLICATION OF PARAMETRIC AND QUESTIONNAIRE METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF DISCOGENIC PAIN SYNDROME IN ADULTS
https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.50.14.006
Abstract
The aim of the research. An analysis and systematization of scales and questionnaires used to diagnose discogenic chronic pain syndrome (DCPS) in Russia and abroad. The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016– 2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. To diagnose back pain and assess the characteristics of its course in dynamics, a standardized study is used: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For a timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of DCPS in patients with intervertebral disk degeneration, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which we ranged into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with DCPS; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in VCPS; scales for assessing disease outcomes in DCPS; and scales for assessing disability in DCPS. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with DCPS. The group of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with DCPS is the most popular in the world neurological practice; however, it is necessary to adapt it to the use in domestic clinical practice of such scales as the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, and The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts (PAL-I). It was also noted that there are no Russian scales used to diagnose back pain and assess the characteristics of its course.
About the Authors
V. V. Trefilova
Hospital for War Veterans; V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Trefilova Vera Vasil’evna – neurologist of the neurological department No. 16, Hospital for War Veterans; postdoc student of the Institute of Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology of the V. M. Bekhterev NMRCPN.
St. Petersburg , 193079, ul. Narodnaya, 21 k2; St. Petersburg, 192029, ul. Bekhtereva, 3 tel. +79233088605
N. A. Shnayder
V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology; Professor V. F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shnayder Natal’ya Alekseevna – neurologist, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher, Deputy Head of the Institute of Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology of the V.M. Bekhterev NMRCPN; Leading Researcher of the Center for Collective Use “Molecular and Cellular Technologies” of the Professor V. F. Voyno-Yasenetsky KSMU.
St. Petersburg, 192029, ul. Bekhtereva, 3; Krasnoyarsk, 660022, ul. Partizana Zheleznyaka, 1
References
1. Levin O.S. Bol’ v spine v obshchej klinicheskoj praktike. M.: Umnyj doktor; 2018.
2. Kurushina O.V., Barulin A.E. Bol’ v spine: prosto o slozhnom ili slozhno o prostom? Rossijskij medicinskij zhurnal. Medicinskoe obozrenie. 2021; 5(10): 642 – 647. https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-10-642647
3. Barinov A.N., Mahinov K.A., Sergienko D.A. Ostraya bol’ v spine. Medicinskij Sovet. 2016; (8): 44 – 49. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2016-8-44-49
4. Rachin A.P., SHarov M.N., Averchenkova A.A., Vygovskaya S.N., Nuvahova M.B. Hronicheskaya bol’: ot patogeneza k innovacionnomu lecheniyu. Rossijskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2017; 9: 625 – 631. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.rmj.ru/articles/nevrologiya/Hronicheskaya_boly_ot_patogeneza_k_innovacionnomu_lecheniyu/
5. Golovacheva V.A., Golovacheva A.A., Golubev V.L. Prakticheskie principy lecheniya hronicheskoj nespecificheskoj boli v nizhnej chasti spiny i komorbidnoj hronicheskoj insomnii: klinicheskoe nablyudenie. Medicinskij sovet. 2021; (10): 164 – 170. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-10-164-170.
6. Vyshlova I.A., Karpov S.M., Berlaj M.V. Patomorfologicheskie izmeneniya pri sindrome hronicheskoj boli v nizhnej chasti spiny. Rossijskij zhurnal boli. 2019; 17(1): 29. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38522124
7. Isajkin A.I., Akarachkova E.S., Isajkina O.YU., Kondrashov A.A., Kir’yanov M.A. Bol’ v spine. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. SPb.: Skifiya-print; M.: Profmedpress; 2021. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://stressundercontrol.ru/assets/docs/2022/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%B2%20%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5_21.12_.pdf
8. Golovacheva V.A. Kak pomoch’ pacientu s hronicheskoj nespecificheskoj bol’yu v nizhnej chasti spiny. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2019; 15(19): 40 – 44. https://doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-19-38-42
9. Will JS, Bury DC, Miller JA. Mechanical Low Back Pain. Am Fam Physician. 2018; 98(7): 421 – 428. Accessed June 26, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30252425/
10. Sielski R, Rief W, Glombiewski JA. Efficacy of Biofeedback in Chronic back Pain: a Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2017; 24(1): 25 – 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9572-9
11. Popescu A, Lee H. Neck Pain and Lower Back Pain. Med Clin North Am. 2020; 104(2): 279 – 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003
12. Kim HS, Wu PH, Jang IT. Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(4): 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041483
13. Nevrologiya. Nacional’noe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie. Pod red. Guseva E.I., Konovalova A.N., Gekht A.B. M.: GEOTARMedia; 2018.
14. CHuryukanov M.V., SHevcova G.E., Zagorul’ko O.I. Nejropaticheskij komponent lyumboishialgii – mekhanizmy razvitiya i puti korrekcii. ZHurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2017; 117(1): 90 - 96. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171171190-96
15. Gushcha A.O., YUsupova A.R. Ocenka iskhodov hirurgicheskogo lecheniya degenerativno-distroficheskih zabolevanij pozvonochnika. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2017; 14(4): 85 – 94. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-ishodov-hirurgicheskogo-lecheniya-degenerativno-distroficheskihzabolevaniy-pozvonochnika
16. Vychuzhanin D., Kuznecov N. Planovaya hirurgiya: prognozirovanie iskhodov vmeshatel’stv. Vrach. 2018; 29(12): 54 – 56. https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2018-12-13
17. Petrova M.M., SHnajder N.A., Pronina E.A., Bobrova O.P. Diagnostika nejropaticheskoj boli: shkaly i voprosniki. Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie. 2020; (3): 61 – 69. https://doi.org/10.20333/2500136-2020-3-61-69
18. Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(3): 503 – 518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5
19. Ramasamy A, Martin ML, Blum SI, Liedgens H, Argoff C, Freynhagen R, Wallace M, McCarrier KP, Bushnell DM, Hatley NV, Patrick DL. Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments to Assess Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Med. 2017; 18(6): 1098 – 1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw357
20. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(22): 2940 – 2952. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
21. Fairbank JC, Davies JB. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy.1980; 66: 271 – 273. Accessed June 26, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6450426/
22. Bersnev V.P., Dragun V.M., Mikailov S.YU., Kudziev A.V. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie poyasnichnogo spinal’nogo stenoza s primeneniem mezhostistyh implantiruyushchih ustrojstv. Politravma. 2016; 1: 18 – 23. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/hirurgicheskoe-lechenie-poyasnichnogospinalnogo-stenoza-s-primeneniem-mezhostistyh-implantiruyuschih-ustroystv
23. Bahtadze M.A., Bolotov D.A., Kuz’minov K.O., Malahovskij V.V., Padun M.P. INDEKS OGRANICHENIYA ZHIZNEDEYATEL’NOSTI IZ-ZA BOLI V NIZHNEJ CHASTI SPINY (OPROSNIK OSVESTRI): LINGVISTICHESKAYA ADAPTACIYA RUSSKOJ VERSII. Manual’naya terapiya. 2016; 3(63): 60 – 66. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333817086_INDEKS_OGRANICENIA_ZIZNEDEATELNOSTI_IZ-ZA_BOLI_V_NIZNEJ_CASTI_SPINY_OPROSNIK_OSVESTRI_LINGVISTICESKAA_ADAPTACIA_RUSSKOJ_VERSII
24. Rossijskoe mezhregional’noe obshchestvo po izucheniyu boli. Klinicheskie rekomendacii «Diagnostika i lechenie diskogennoj poyasnichno-krestcovoj radikulopatii». 2021. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://painrussia.ru/publications/reference-materials-and-guides/%D0%94%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA_%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%A0%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%91_2020.pdf
25. Brodke DS, Goz V, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Neese A, Hung M. Oswestry Disability Index: a psychometric analysis with 1,610 patients. Spine J. 2017; 17(3): 321 – 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.020
26. Selva-Sevilla C, Ferrara P, Gerónimo-Pardo M. Psychometric Properties Study of the Oswestry Disability Index in a Spanish Population With Previous Lumbar Disc Surgery: Homogeneity and Validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(7): 430 – 437. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002867
27. Al Amer HS, Alanazi F, ELdesoky M, Honin A. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4): e0231382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231382
28. Binaya K, Kajal T, Ranjeeta AS, Govinda N. Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021; 5(1): 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00343-9
29. Phedy P, Djaja YP, Tobing SDAL, Gatam L, Librianto D, Fachrisal, Gatam AR, Hardiansyah NP. Crosscultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Indonesian version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(4): 1053 – 1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06690-3
30. Adamu AS, Ibrahim AA, Ahmad RY, Akindele MO, Kaka B, Mukhtar NB. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(18): 1092 – 1102. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003068
31. Mbada CE, Oguntoyinbo OE, Fasuyi FO, Idowu OA, Odole AC, Ayanniyi O, Johnson OE, Orimolade EA, Oladiran AB, Fatoye F. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1): 0221138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221138
32. Shah S, Balaganapathy M. Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017; 30(5): 1103 – 1109. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169728
33. Sandal D, Jindal R, Gupta S, Garg SK. Reliability and validity of Punjabi version of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with mechanical low back pain. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 13: 163 – 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.011
34. Amjad F, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Gilani SA. et al. Urdu version of Oswestry disability index; a reliability and validity study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22: 311 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04173-0
35. Martin CT, Yaszemski AK, Ledonio CGT, Barrack TC, Polly DW Jr. Oswestry Disability Index: Is Telephone Administration Valid? Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(2): 92 – 94. Accessed June 26, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32577114/
36. Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Ostelo RW. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2016; 96(10): 1620 – 1637. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150420
37. Bahtadze M.A., Lusnikova I. V., Kanaev S.P., Rasstrigin S.N. Bol’ v nizhnej chasti spiny: kakie shkaly i oprosniki vybrat’? Rossijskij zhurnal boli. 2020; 18(1): 22 – 28. https://doi.org/10.17116/pain20201801122
38. Kersten RFMR, Fikkers J, Wolterbeek N, Öner FC, van Gaalen SM. Are the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index interchangeable in patients after lumbar spinal fusion? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021; 34(4): 605 – 611. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-200206
39. Chiarotto A, Ostelo RW, Boers M, Terwee CB. A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 95: 73 – 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.005
40. Raheem S, Ibrahim AA, Ganiyu SO, Faruk AU, Akindele MO. Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Hausa Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Mixed Rural and Urban Nigerian Populations with Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46(11): 639 – 647. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003867
41. Ibrahim AA, Akindele MO, Kaka B, Mukhtar NB. Development of the Hausa version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in mixed urban and rural patients with chronic low back pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021; 19(1): 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01644-1
42. Tarakanov A.A., Efremov V.V. Instrumental’naya validaciya oprosnika «Bol’ v nizhnej chasti spiny i narushenie zhiznedeyatel’nosti (Roland-Morris)». Rossijskij zhurnal boli. 2018; 2(56): 96 – 97. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34966889
43. Bahtadze M.A., Bolotov D.A., Kuz’minov, K.O. Indeks ogranicheniya zhiznedeyatel’nosti iz-za boli v nizhnej chasti spiny (oprosnik Osvestri): ocenka nadezhnosti i validnosti russkoj versii. Manual’naya terapiya. 2016; 64(4): 24 – 33. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333817122_Indeks_ogranicenia_ziznedeatelnosti_iz-za_boli_v_niznej_casti_spiny_oprosnik_Osvestri_ocenka_nadeznosti_i_validnosti_russkoj_versii
44. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, Williams JI. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(3): 341 – 352. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016
45. Wewege MA, Jones MD, McAuley JH. Clinimetrics: Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. J Physiother. 2020; 66(4): 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.05.005
46. Speksnijder CM., Koppenaal T, Knottnerus JA, Spigt M, Staal JB, Terwee CB. Measurement Properties of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review. Physical Therapy. 2016; 96(11): 1816 – 1831. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140478
47. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(16): 2095 – 20102. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200008150-00015
48. Koç M, Bayar B, Bayar K. A Comparison of Back Pain Functional Scale With Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36-Health Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(12): 877 – 882. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002431
49. Alkan H, Yildiz N, Ardiç F. The Correlations Between Disease Specific Quality of Life, Short Form-36 and Clinical Variables in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arch Rheumatol. 2020; 35(4): 468 – 476. https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2020.7750
50. Arovah NI, Heesch KC. Verification of the Reliability and Validity of the Short Form 36 Scale in Indonesian Middle-aged and Older Adults. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020; 53(3): 180 – 188. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.19.324
51. CHebykin A.V., Minasov T.B., Nazarov A.F. Ekspertnye voprosy v medicinskoj reabilitacii vertebrologicheskih pacientov. Zdorov’e sem’i – 21 vek. 2016; 1(1): 104 – 121. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303533169_EXPERT_QUESTIONS_OF_MEDICAL_REHABILITATION_OF_Spine_PatientS
52. Kashkina N.V., Botalov N.S., Nekrasova YU.E. IZUCHENIE POKAZATELEJ KACHESTVA ZHIZNI U BOL’NYH IBS S ISPOL’ZOVANIEM OPROSNIKA SF-36. Mezhdunarodnyj studencheskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2018; 5. Ssylka aktivna na 26.06.2022. https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=18667
53. Cetin AA, Bektas H, Ozdogan M. The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2016; 20: 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.007
54. Eklund A, Bergström G, Bodin L, Axén I. Do psychological and behavioral factors classified by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Swedish version) predict the early clinical course of low back pain in patients receiving chiropractic care? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0933-y
55. Peipert A, Engel E, Ehrlich-Jones L. Measurement Characteristics and Clinical Utility of the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory in a Chronic Pain Population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018; 99: 417 – 418. Accessed June 26, 2022. https://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S00039993(17)31093-6/pdf
56. Stokes J, Evans CJ, Pompilus F, Shields AL, Summers KH. (2013). Chronic Low Back Pain Impact Questionnaire (CLBP-IQ). APA PsycTests. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1037/t31105-000
57. Poquet N, Lin C. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Physiother. 2016; 62(1): 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.001
58. Im DD, Jambaulikar GD, Kikut A, Gale J, Weiner SG. Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form: A New Method for Assessing Pain in the Emergency Department. Pain Med. 2020; 21(12): 3263 – 3269. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa269
59. Rzaev D.A., Mojsak G.I., Amelina E.V., Kulikova E.V., Denisova N.P., Fomin G.YU. Validizaciya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika Brief pain Inventory – facial (BPI-Facial) u bol’nyh s licevymi bolyami. Nevrologicheskij zhurnal. 2016; 2. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9545-2016-21-2-97-104
60. Stanhope J. Brief Pain Inventory review. Occup Med (Lond). 2016; 66(6): 496 – 497. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw041
61. Im DD, Jambaulikar GD, Kikut A, Gale J, Weiner SG. Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form: A New Method for Assessing Pain in the Emergency Department. Pain Med. 2020; 21(12): 3263 – 3269. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa269
62. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005; 113(1-2): 9 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
63. Jumbo SU, MacDermid JC, Kalu ME, Packham TL, Athwal GS, Faber KJ. Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire-Version-2 (SFMPQ-2) in Pain-related Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review Protocol. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8(2): 131 – 141. https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2020.36779.1973
64. Jumbo SU, MacDermid JC, Kalu ME, Packham TL, Athwal GS, Faber KJ. Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Pain-related Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2021; 37(6): 454 – 474. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000933
65. Beemster T, van Bennekom C, van Velzen J, Reneman M, Frings-Dresen M. The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018; 16(1): 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1000-1
66. Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause SJ. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987; 68(7): 438 – 441. Accessed June 26, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19556299_The_Pain_Disability_Index_Psychometric_and_validity_data
67. McKillop AB, Carroll LJ, Dick BD, Battié MC. Measuring participation in patients with chronic back painthe 5-Item Pain Disability Index. Spine J. 2018; 18(2): 307 – 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.172
68. Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984; 59(3): 974. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.974
69. Bushnell DM, Blum SI, Liedgens H, Martin ML, Freynhagen R, Wallace M, Argoff C, Eerdekens M, Kok M, Patrick DL. Mixed-methods development of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for chronic low back pain: part 2-The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain-Impacts (PAL-I). Pain. 2018; 159(10): 2066 – 2075. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001309
70. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Eerdekens M, Christoph A, Kralidis G, Liedgens H. Pain assessment for chronic lower back pain: performance of the PAL-S and PAL-I patient-reported measures for symptoms and impacts. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2020; 36(5): 853 – 863. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1744119
Review
For citations:
Trefilova V.V., Shnayder N.A. APPLICATION OF PARAMETRIC AND QUESTIONNAIRE METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF DISCOGENIC PAIN SYNDROME IN ADULTS. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Medical Sciences. 2023;(3):45-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.50.14.006
Views:
267
Email this article 